Re: Your Participation Policy | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David Heimann (heimann![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 07:33:13 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi Phil (and others),Interesting. Is the community OK enough with losing two common-space rooms that everyone is paying for and that detract from would-be sales, enough to not do anything about it? Has this been verified at a General Meeting? Has anyone exercised "reverse consensus", i.e., making it an issue enough to force it onto the table to address?
Very curious, David Heimann Jamaica Plain CohousingAt Cornerstone in Cambridge, MA, we?ve had a very light touch since the beginning, operating under the premise: ?No volunteers? = Not important!
But is it true that ?everything gets done?? ?For instance, in an urban community where every square foot is expensive, limited and precious, our workshop has turned into a junk dump. ?Lacking a volunteer for stewardship, it?s now pretty much useless and unused. ?The putative exercise room is only a tad better.
Maybe this is how we ?vote", how we decide that a space is ?unimportant?, without the formality of holding a meeting. ?But the premise feels a bit Panglossian to me. ?(Just one opinion among many ?)
------------------ Thanks, RPD Almost everything in life can be explained by momentum, inertia, or entropy.
- Re: Your Participation Policy, (continued)
- Re: Your Participation Policy Bonnie Fergusson, April 6 2023
-
Re: Your Participation Policy David Heimann, April 1 2023
-
Re: Your Participation Policy Philip Dowds, April 6 2023
- Re: Your Participation Policy Mabel Liang, April 6 2023
-
Re: Your Participation Policy Philip Dowds, April 6 2023
- Re: Your Participation Policy David Heimann, April 10 2023
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.