Evocoho on Cohousing-L vs separate list [was::"Do you know of..." | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:59:01 -0700 (PDT) |
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 Sharon Villines wrote: > Stay on this list and adopt a unique subject line so > people can easily find messages that relate to retrofit. Kevin Wolf wrote: > Good advice. [ Discuss "retrofit" cohousing on cohousing-L with a sprcial word in subject line to facilitate searching rather than a separate list. ] I concur. Keep discussion here. Long ago we tried to have a mailing list for "urban" cohousing but it withered away. Making a list viable usually requires a larger subscriber list of interested people or high commitment from a group of people, or very high commitment from a few people to keep posting useful information. Cohousing-L has 1100+ subscribers which has been a big factor in it's being around for 30 years. As Kevin knows we have had reservations about "retrofit" for a long time as a term to refer to this alternative form of cohousing and have not found a suitable alternative. Today I suggest for the subject line on this topic "evocoho" (contracted from evolutionary cohousing). A web search for evocoho only got two (unrelated) hits. A search of the archives: +subject:retrofit currently gets 235 hits. If "evocoho" were adopted as for inclusion to make a "unique subject line" a post with Subject: Retrofit cohousing -- see evocoho would tie them together. I have a little web page about retrofit cohousing that has not been kept uptodate: http://mn.cohousing.org/retrofit/ Tho for the 2015 National Cohousing Conference we did work on an updated list of retrofit cohousing communities. Fred -- Fred H. Olson Minneapolis,MN 55411 USA (near north Mpls) Email: fholson at cohousing.org 612-588-9532 My Link Pg: http://fholson.cohousing.org
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.