RE: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elise Matthesen (EMATTHESEN![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 14:41 CST |
What might be lost in leaving it up to the developer? Depending on the developer's experience, one might lose expertise in designing for the disabled. Nobody thinks about that *quite* the same way as those of us who are; probably the able-bodied folk don't have the blessing of continual motivation to consider the issue. (Insert wry grin here.) If any other communities are dealing with non-traditional family structures (yes, that includes us polyamorous folks) there may be some "two adults / monogamous marriage" assumptions that get in the way of a good fit. A good developer can work around her own personal assumptions to fit the client, though.
-
An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal MDANNER, November 11 1993
- RE: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal Elise Matthesen, November 11 1993
- Re: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal Fred H Olson -- WB0YQM, November 11 1993
-
RE: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal BARANSKI, November 12 1993
- RE: An alternative to the coho dev. ordeal Nancy Wight, November 12 1993
- An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal Jim Kingdon, November 14 1993
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.