Re: A cohousing consultant and workshop | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Ratliff (jratliff![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 93 13:07 CST |
On 1:02 PM 11/12/93 -0600, david sucher wrote: >On Fri, 12 Nov 1993 BARANSKI [at] VEAMF1.NL.NUWC.NAVY.MIL wrote: > >> I see that Winslow currently has a vacancy, which is for sale for $174,000! >> >> I can't see where the attention to affordability went! > > >You've come right to the heart of the matter. I don't see what the >(necessary) difference is between a well-designed conodominium and a >co-housing project, oncew you are five years or so down the road. > >David Sucher I never thought that affordability was the defining characteristic of cohousing. Cohousing most fundamentally is about community. Do you know of a "well-designed condominium" where people share meals in their common house? ___ | \_|IM RATLIFF Tucson Cohousing jratliff [at] bpa.Arizona.edu
- Re: A cohousing consultant and workshop, (continued)
- Re: A cohousing consultant and workshop rehm, November 11 1993
-
Re: A cohousing consultant and workshop BARANSKI, November 12 1993
- Re: A cohousing consultant and workshop david sucher, November 12 1993
- Re: A cohousing consultant and workshop rehm, November 12 1993
- Re: A cohousing consultant and workshop Jim Ratliff, November 12 1993
-
Re: A cohousing consultant and workshop Elise Matthesen, November 12 1993
-
A cohousing consultant and workshop Jerry Callen, November 12 1993
- Why not? Trey Wedge, November 12 1993
- Re: Why not? Nancy Wight, November 12 1993
-
A cohousing consultant and workshop Jerry Callen, November 12 1993
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.