Re: Quorum definition? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Nancy Wight (wight![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 93 13:17 CST |
> If you use a consensus process, then a quorum should be a sufficient > percentage to allow everyone's perspective to be represented. For > instance, if I have a principled disagrement with a proposal on the > agenda and would block approval if I were present, someone who is aware > of that could block that proposal on my behalf while other business could > take place. > > -r As Jim Salem stated, we use a simple majority of households for a quorum. However, we are fairly adamant that people who aren't at a meeting do not have the right to block consensus (this could hold us up even LONGER than it already takes). This is mainly because the consensus process only works through discussing the different sides of the issue, and someone who thinks they want to block may well change their minds after listening to the discussion, or at least may be able to influence the wording of a proposal that would be a compromise. It also encourages people to attend meetings. Because of this, we try to make sure that we don't try to consense on a proposal if we know there is someone opposing it who is not there (which, admittedly, is not always easy). - Nancy New View, Acton
-
Quorum definition? Jim Ratliff, November 14 1993
- Quorum definition? Date: Sun, 14 Nov 93 14:27 CST From: jratliff [at] bpavms.bpa.arizona.edu (Jim Ratliff) Jim Salem, November 14 1993
- Re: Quorum definition? Gary Campbell, November 14 1993
-
Re: Quorum definition? Robert Hartman, November 15 1993
- Re: Quorum definition? Nancy Wight, November 15 1993
- Re: Quorum definition? James Rubarth-Lay, November 15 1993
- Re: Quorum definition? Jim Ratliff, November 15 1993
- Re: Quorum definition? Robert Hartman, November 15 1993
- Re: Quorum definition? BARANSKI, November 15 1993
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.