Re: Consulting fee assessments | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Robert Hartman (hartman![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 94 14:05:58 PST |
What is the consulting for? Financial, architectural, or organizational issues? How long do you anticipate deriving benefit from the services to be provided? If it's financial, then ideally the consulting fee should be paid for out of cost savings or increased earnings. If it's architectural, then the cost could be spread over the life of the affected structures. If its organizational, then I don't see how future members could be expected to pay for help that the current members found necessary to resolve a crisis. But if it's help with fundamental documents such as by-laws or covenants, those costs could be spread across the life of a mortgage. If members have to put up extra money now to cover those expenses, this up-front money could be credited to their equity share or applied to reducing their monthly membership fee on a pro-rated basis. -r
-
Consulting fee assessments SMITHMCC, January 4 1994
- RE: Consulting fee assessments Rob Sandelin, January 4 1994
- Re: Consulting fee assessments Robert Hartman, January 4 1994
- Re: Consulting fee assessments Nancy Wight, January 5 1994
- Re: Consulting fee assessments Pablo Halpern, January 5 1994
- Re: Consulting fee assessments Rob Sandelin, January 12 1994
- Re: Consulting fee assessments Nancy Wight, January 17 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.