Re: Economic naivete | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kieran Roe (kroe![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 1994 22:20:17 -0500 (EST) |
I don't think naivete is a virtue in itself, in this world of hard knocks. But I would never want to knock it either. Some of the greatest work has been done by inspired idealists who, if they knew more about the "realities" of what they were getting into might have never taken first steps; who looked at injustice's pitiful face, said , "that ain't right" and did something about it. Affordable housing should be an option everywhere, not just on the Redneck Riviera. Its a problem that requires complex, not simple solutions. Cohousing may have a very important role to play -- taking the developer middle man out may take something off the price. Likewise, shared facilities and resources, and bulk purchasing. Just because something is affordable doesn't mean someone won't take pride and maintain and improve it. Especially in the context of a community where people can start to see that sharing the ups and downs of life is much more satisfying than keeping up with the joneses. Enjoy the riches of community from your little house! Its definitely a balance -- I think some scheme like granting allowances for physical improvements made plus an increase matching the rate of inflation gives an individual all the incentive he/she really needs to keep a place nice -- if they really want to be there in the first place. If they want to make a real estate killing they shouldn't be in cohousing in the first place.
-
Economic naivete biow, January 3 1994
- Re: Economic naivete david sucher, January 3 1994
- Re: Economic naivete Robert Hartman, January 4 1994
- Re: Economic naivete Kieran Roe, January 7 1994
- Economic naivete Jerry Callen, January 13 1994
- Re: Economic naivete IAN_HIG, January 13 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.