Re: Urban cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Robert Hartman (hartman![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 94 13:18:50 PST |
> From: apguirard [at] mmm.com > > > ... I'm wondering if anyone has any experience > > with taking over existing structures in the city and converting them > > for cohousing. ... > > TRG cohousing considered this as an option. We had some concerns that the > existing architecture of an apartment building was not amenable to cohousing > because most are designed in such a way that people can just go directly to > their units without seeing or speaking to anyone. Apartment designers > never intended that people should sit outside their units, for instance, > and chat with people passing by. That means that to adapt an apartment > building to cohousing, unless the corridors were already more spacious > than in any apartment I have seen, you would probably have to move a lot > of walls. That would depend, I think. I remember back in college days when each floor of the dorm had a lounge. All or part of an apartment facing the elevator or stairs could be converted into an floor lounge or sitting area. You could put in a card, pool, or foosball table, some comfy chairs, and a kitchenette. Or you could make a play area for kids. There is a lot that can be done with an urban structure. You just have to be creative about adapting the existing spaces. -r
- Re: Urban cohousing, (continued)
- Re: Urban cohousing Rob Sandelin, February 22 1994
- RE: Urban cohousing Rob Sandelin, February 22 1994
- Urban cohousing Dave Hurst, February 22 1994
- Re: Urban cohousing apguirard, February 22 1994
- Re: Urban cohousing Robert Hartman, February 22 1994
- RE: Urban cohousing Trey Wedge, February 22 1994
- Re: Urban cohousing Laura Bagnall, February 22 1994
- Re: Urban cohousing apguirard, February 22 1994
- Re: Urban cohousing Martin Schafer, February 22 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.