animal Policy | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: BARANSKI (BARANSKI![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 1994 12:47:22 -0500 (EST) |
It seems that some of the pet owners (specifically dog owners) feel they should be able to let their pets run free all of the time, even when they are not home (quoting the lack of a "leash law" in the town). Others who are allergic to, have children who are frightened by, or simply don't like having to deal with dogs wherever they go on the site, object strongly to this. There are many compromises available, but all of them restrict in some way the time and/or location that pets can run free, which is unacceptable to those pet owners. Tough decision! I think any decision about something that is going to be everywhere or nowhere is going to be tough... I would think that the only solution would be some compromise about where the dogs were allowed... But perhaps you can try to address some of the individual issues about the dogs: What restrictions on dogs will be helpfull to those with allergies? I would assume that it would be helpfull for dogs to not be *inside* common space as a general rule. Is it helpfull to restrict the dogs outside movements? I wouldn't think so... What restrictions on dogs will be helpfull to frightened children? Or is it parents of frightened children? I would think it would be good for the children to get used to well behaved dogs; and for dogs to behave themselves, and learn who doesn't want to have them around (allergic / scared) What restrictions will be helpfull to those who just don't want to deal with dogs? The only one I can think of, is just plain, no dogs. I think these people need to articulate their concerns in more detail. I don't think it's fair to impose a few people's ideosyncracies on everything else, especially if they can't be explained. In general, I would go with asking myself how would this situation be handled outside the community. Is it reasonable for someone allergic to dogs to expect never to run across them? I don't think so. Like wise for children, and people who just don't want to deal... Of course it goes without saying that any animals have to be well behaved, if they are going to be running around loose. IE Not digging up plants, fighting each other, bothering people when they are not wanted, etc. If you run across one of these problems, you will need to address that particular instance with that dog. BTw, I would expect that a co-housing community would tend to have fewer pets per capita then normal, especially free running pets, as these can be shared pretty well. Who needs a dog all to themselves? :-) Otherwise, the population density of animals may become a bigger problem then the human population density. If every family has a dog, you are *definitely* going to have dog-pack problems. If the community just has two or three shared dogs running around, they are likely to be able to learn their place in the community pretty well. Like I said, I think you'll have an easier time sharing 'outside' animals, then 'inside' animals. On the other hande, 'inside' animals won't impact other people... Jim.
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.