Re: monthly assessments | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 12:01 CDT |
Jim S-G, New View Steering Committee wrote: >\(In the current draft of our >condo docs we have enshrined our 'consensus with a fallback to voting' policy >in legalese. The fall-back voting percentages are those as specified by the >Uniform Condo Act & the secondary market requirements (FNMA), so that (we hope) >no lender will be freaked out. I would be very interested in hearing what the FNMA says, if anything, about consensus in your condo declarations. We were told by our both our attorney, and the lady from the FNMA review board, that the word consensus would cause our declarations not to be approved, so we didn't include it in our legal declarions but have it as an operating policy in our internal bylaws and convenants which banks do not usually see. Be sure your attorney passes the declaration past an FNMA review, although maybe the rules, or attitudes have changed or are different in MA than WA. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood
-
monthly assessments Judy, April 22 1994
- Re: monthly assessments Jim_Snyder-Grant . LOTUS, April 25 1994
- Re: monthly assessments Rob Sandelin, April 25 1994
- Monthly assessments Rob Sandelin, November 3 1994
- Re: Monthly assessments Donna Spreitzer, November 3 1994
- Re: Monthly assessments Stephen Hawthorne, November 4 1994
- Re: Monthly assessments Ian Higginbottom, November 7 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.