RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 24 May 94 18:31 CDT |
Stuart, you say >The kind of nightmare I envisage is a speculative developer builds a >"cohousing" community, complete with common house, community kitchen, >appropriately small houses. Maybe he even sets up bylaws dictating that >the decision making procedure be by consensus. Everybody who buys a >house in the development owns part of the CH. The developer advertises >the wonders of cohousing in the local media and manages to sell all the >lots to interested people who don't know each other. Everybody moves >in. Isn't this exactly what is going to happen to current existing cohousing groups 20-30 years from now when all us founders are moved out or dead? If you set the expectations and the processes up now there is no guarantee of its continuance in the future. The same could be said for having developer designed and built cohousing, there is nothing to ensure it will create community or not, only the expectations and intentions of the people who live there. Isn't setting expectations precisely what advertising does? If people see the safe happy kids playing it sets their expectations. This is exactly what the cohousing book did for me, it set my expectations higher than the normal housing paradigm. If the only way to build a community is to go through the whole process of land development then cohousing has no sustainable future as a community endeavor. As people move in who did not go through that process they will overtake the people who did and eventually replace them. I think it is the expectations and intentions of the people, aided by the structures and processes which sustain and build the community, no matter who builds or develops the site. If the people who come to live there, have the expectations set to live cooperatively, and it is their intention to do so, they will make an honest effort to succeed. If there is guidance along the way, especially gentle hints and training in cooperative ways of being, the possibilities of success are raised. Granted those of us who went through, are going through the trenches of creating these developments are learning under fire how to communicate our issues and work together. It is our way as pioneers to do so and to teach these things to the settlers who come after us. I have also said this before: Community is not a destination, it is a journey. You never really arrive at community and only when you leave the journey do you understand what it was you experienced. I really wish that you and I and jean and some of the other folks that have been having this discussion could hang out at my house (or yours) and shoot the breeze over a couple of beers or cups of tea. I guess this is the next best thing but..... Rob
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please, (continued)
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Rob Sandelin, May 24 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Jean Pfleiderer, May 24 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Rob Sandelin, May 24 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Stuart Staniford-Chen, May 24 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Rob Sandelin, May 24 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Pablo Halpern, May 25 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Pablo Halpern, May 25 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Rob Sandelin, May 25 1994
- Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Jim Slotta, May 25 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.