| Re: gudielines for communication | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Kevin Wolf (dcn00056 |
|
| Date: Thu, 26 May 94 01:39 CDT | |
At the end of this string Pablo writes a thoughtful piece on what is
advertising and the pr{blems with it on the net. I would like to hear
cohousers thoughts on what of the following would cross the line into
being unacceptable to post to this list.
1. A letter answering a question on financing cohousing with an end note
saying that you are a professional in this field and are available for hire.
2. A booklet on Making Meetings Successful with a cover letter saying
that if people liked the booklet they could send $5 to help cover the
ccosts of developing it. Or they could order hardcopies in bulk by mail
for their community mates.
3. An announcement of a training program in (meeting process, financing,
living together, etc) for a price. What if the training was a
fundraiser for the community.
One of the above I would like to send hhere but I would like to know what
the etiquette. I look forward to your replies. Please post to the list.
---
Kevin Wolf
724 N St
Davis, CA 95616
phone and fax: 916-758-4211
On Wed, 25 May 1994, Pablo Halpern wrote:
> > From: david sucher <dsucher [at] cyberspace.com>
> >
> > On Tue, 24 May 1994, Joel Spector wrote:
> >
> > david sucher wrote:
> > > >Suppose one wanted to take part in starting a cohousing group because i
> > > >would be very personally gratifying, fulfilling and beneficial....
> > > >Would it be appropriate to make an overture to others on this list
> > > >and invite them to join in?
> > >
> > > Fine by me. Where?
> > >
> > > Joel
> >
> > My point was 'What's the difference between personal benefit and profit?'
> >
>
> Personal benefit is when you are involved in something and you want others
> to work on it with you or otherwise support you. You are not in it for money
> or any other reason other than to get a community built (or whatever).
> Since supporting cohousing a the primary objective of this mailing list,
> posting such an appeal here would be totally appropriate.
>
> Profit is money. Some people make profits doing very worthwhile things.
> Other people make profits by exploitation. The problem is that if the most
> obvious purpose is to make a profit, then the underlying ethics can be hard
> to read. I draw the line when the primary (or at least a major) purpose of
> a promotion is to make a profit for the person doing the promotion. You can
> tell me about a great toy for my kids and I will take that at face value if
> you do not work for the toy manafacturer. The toy would be just as good
> even if you *do* work for the manafacturer but I don't have the time or
> inclination to sort the wheat from the chaff when it comes to potentially
> profit-motivated promotions. In the latter case, I would probably consider
> the promotion to be an ad and would not consider it appropriate for
> unsolicited EMAIL. If, on the other hand, you made toys for no profit
> because you believed in it, I would expect you to say so and I would treat
> the communication differently.
>
> Again, its not that making a profit is bad (I work for money and promote
> myself), it's just that I expect commercial advertisements to be labled as
> such and kept away from my EMAIL box.
>
> Specifically, the Mt. Shasta ad was an ad, pure and simple. We all know it.
> People try to make ads sound like "in your interest" all the time. I'm
> tired of giving such people the benefit of the doubt. The ad might be sent
> to someone who appreciates it and I might be interested in what any given ad
> has to say, but that does not change the fact that it is an ad. The NSF
> rules for use of their internet backbone discourage (prohibit?) comercial
> advertising. The Mt. Shasta ad is a violation of this principle. If we
> permit this kind of thing, the next ad may be more offensive, and they may
> start coming more frequently. Even if I liked the Mt. Shasta ad, I don't
> want to set the precident of conding electronc junk mail.
>
> - Pablo
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pablo Halpern (508) 435-5274 phalpern [at] world.std.com
>
> New View Neighborhood Development, Acton, MA
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-
gudielines for communication david sucher, May 24 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication Joel Spector, May 24 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication david sucher, May 24 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication Pablo Halpern, May 25 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication Kevin Wolf, May 25 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication david sucher, May 26 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication Pablo Halpern, May 26 1994
- Re: Re: gudielines for communication Lynne Farnum, May 26 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.