Re: gudielines for communication | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kevin Wolf (dcn00056![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 26 May 94 01:39 CDT |
At the end of this string Pablo writes a thoughtful piece on what is advertising and the pr{blems with it on the net. I would like to hear cohousers thoughts on what of the following would cross the line into being unacceptable to post to this list. 1. A letter answering a question on financing cohousing with an end note saying that you are a professional in this field and are available for hire. 2. A booklet on Making Meetings Successful with a cover letter saying that if people liked the booklet they could send $5 to help cover the ccosts of developing it. Or they could order hardcopies in bulk by mail for their community mates. 3. An announcement of a training program in (meeting process, financing, living together, etc) for a price. What if the training was a fundraiser for the community. One of the above I would like to send hhere but I would like to know what the etiquette. I look forward to your replies. Please post to the list. --- Kevin Wolf 724 N St Davis, CA 95616 phone and fax: 916-758-4211 On Wed, 25 May 1994, Pablo Halpern wrote: > > From: david sucher <dsucher [at] cyberspace.com> > > > > On Tue, 24 May 1994, Joel Spector wrote: > > > > david sucher wrote: > > > >Suppose one wanted to take part in starting a cohousing group because i > > > >would be very personally gratifying, fulfilling and beneficial.... > > > >Would it be appropriate to make an overture to others on this list > > > >and invite them to join in? > > > > > > Fine by me. Where? > > > > > > Joel > > > > My point was 'What's the difference between personal benefit and profit?' > > > > Personal benefit is when you are involved in something and you want others > to work on it with you or otherwise support you. You are not in it for money > or any other reason other than to get a community built (or whatever). > Since supporting cohousing a the primary objective of this mailing list, > posting such an appeal here would be totally appropriate. > > Profit is money. Some people make profits doing very worthwhile things. > Other people make profits by exploitation. The problem is that if the most > obvious purpose is to make a profit, then the underlying ethics can be hard > to read. I draw the line when the primary (or at least a major) purpose of > a promotion is to make a profit for the person doing the promotion. You can > tell me about a great toy for my kids and I will take that at face value if > you do not work for the toy manafacturer. The toy would be just as good > even if you *do* work for the manafacturer but I don't have the time or > inclination to sort the wheat from the chaff when it comes to potentially > profit-motivated promotions. In the latter case, I would probably consider > the promotion to be an ad and would not consider it appropriate for > unsolicited EMAIL. If, on the other hand, you made toys for no profit > because you believed in it, I would expect you to say so and I would treat > the communication differently. > > Again, its not that making a profit is bad (I work for money and promote > myself), it's just that I expect commercial advertisements to be labled as > such and kept away from my EMAIL box. > > Specifically, the Mt. Shasta ad was an ad, pure and simple. We all know it. > People try to make ads sound like "in your interest" all the time. I'm > tired of giving such people the benefit of the doubt. The ad might be sent > to someone who appreciates it and I might be interested in what any given ad > has to say, but that does not change the fact that it is an ad. The NSF > rules for use of their internet backbone discourage (prohibit?) comercial > advertising. The Mt. Shasta ad is a violation of this principle. If we > permit this kind of thing, the next ad may be more offensive, and they may > start coming more frequently. Even if I liked the Mt. Shasta ad, I don't > want to set the precident of conding electronc junk mail. > > - Pablo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Pablo Halpern (508) 435-5274 phalpern [at] world.std.com > > New View Neighborhood Development, Acton, MA > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >
-
gudielines for communication david sucher, May 24 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication Joel Spector, May 24 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication david sucher, May 24 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication Pablo Halpern, May 25 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication Kevin Wolf, May 25 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication david sucher, May 26 1994
- Re: gudielines for communication Pablo Halpern, May 26 1994
- Re: Re: gudielines for communication Lynne Farnum, May 26 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.