Re: Political context of cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: RAYGASSER (RAYGASSER![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 94 22:51 CDT |
I found Craig Willis' missive quite interesting, concernong the political context of CoHo, and living in a group of *like-minded* people. It seems that for people to get together, meet regularly for two to four years, pool resources, find and agree on a housing site and buy or build houses together, people must have similar mind-sets. On the other hand, I think it gets a bit dangerous to be living and hanging out only with those of similar belief. Conversation and discourse can get a bit boring if every time you say something, the person across the table agrees. E.g., my wife and I think so much alike that it often seems like we don't even need to speak. Thank the deities that we have lots of things we enjoy doing together, or we'd probably bore each other to tears! And besides being *boring*, dealing only within one limited viewpoint can lead to narrow-mindedness, and if it is rarely challenged with opposing ideas, can lead to a feeling of "correctness" or elitism. "If nobody around me tells me I'm wrong, I must be right!" But I know what you mean. I'd rather live with people I agree with most of the time, too. On the economic side: My family was interviewed for the March 94 issue of American Demographics Magazine (a Dow Jones Pub) for a cohousing section of an article on Environmentalism. We are part of EcoVillage at Ithaca, which is cohousing deeply integrated with internal sustainability and is set up as a non-profit educational and environmental study group chartered to change the way people live. The magazine is for people who want to know how to sell things and who to sell them to. The article was extremely positive about cohousing, probably because it was based almost exclusively on interviews with us and with our guiding light, Joan Bokaer. But somehow someday someone's gonna turn this into more "how can I make a buck on cohousing?" The last paragraph reads: "The news from Maplewood should give marketers pause. Five hundred people moving to EcoVillage certainly won't hurt anyone's profits, But what happens if millions of people start paying attention to these ideas? If you're selling something people don't really need, the results could be cata- strophic." Yeah, and the fact that maybe we're saving some of the planet might not matter. Personally, I don't care if people make money of of the cohousing idea. As long as people look at it, check it out thoroughly, and use it if it makes sense for themselves, cohousing will eventually become a mainstream social technology. Ray Gasser, Maplewood, NJ EcoVillage at Ithaca, NY raygasser [at] delphi.com
-
Political context of cohousing Craig D. Willis, September 3 1994
- Re: Political context of cohousing Kevin Wolf, September 3 1994
- Re: Political context of cohousing Kevin Wolf, September 4 1994
- Re: Political context of cohousing RAYGASSER, September 4 1994
- RE: Political context of cohousing Rob Sandelin, September 6 1994
- Re: Political context of cohousing Rob Sandelin, September 12 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.