| Re: Re: Electric Resistance Heating | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Roger Diggle (diggle |
|
| Date: Wed, 12 Oct 94 06:13 CDT | |
> Any consideration of the efficiency of electric resistance heating
> (I despise the term "radiant heating" applied to coils of wire)
> must include the 16% to 25% transmission losses. So, any resistance
> heating device is at most 84% efficient, unless you collect the
> electricity yourself with your own wind mill, PV cells or hydro.
> -Chas
I agree witht the efficiency argument here... The power company loves to
talk about electric heat being "100% efficient" because they start measuring
at your meter rather than at the power plant.
However, I have to disagree with the complaint about "...the term 'radiant
heating' applied to coils of wire". In the appropriate circumstances, a
radiant source of any kind, electric or not, delivers more
comfort-units-per-energy-unit than other methods. For instance, in a
bathroom, it will take fewer watt-hours to make your bare skin (or the
surface of your toilet seat) comfortable using an radiant electric heater
than using a fan-forced electric heater that heats the air directly.
Electricity is a crappy fuel to heat with in most instances. But if I can
keep my entire house 10f cooler in the morning by using a radiant heater in
the bathroom for 10 minutes, it's a good trade-off energy-wise.
Roger Diggle
- via BulkRate 2.0
***********************************************************************
Mac Line BBS: (608) 233-9487 - A FirstClass System in Madison, WI USA
**********************************************************************
-
Re: Electric Resistance Heating Charles Ehrlich, October 11 1994
- Re: Re: Electric Resistance Heating Roger Diggle, October 12 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.