Re: cohousing in Canada | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jeffrey O. Hobson (johobson![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 02:28 CST |
Tom, please pass this to Russell: The CMHC report you mentioned sounded interesting. Do you have a summary of the conclusions of the CMHC report with regard to encouraging "user participant design" and *why* that will advance sustainability? It makes some sense intuitively, but I can also imagine someone persuasively arguing the opposite, so I'd like to know if CMHC folks have good evidence. I'd like to know whether the report is basically someone arguing why user participant design *should* encourage sustainability, or whether the report shows, via existing projects and comparative data, that participant design on average actually *does* encourage sustainability as compared to "conventional" design. If it is the latter, the report is probably something people on this list would be able to use to obtain grant funding. I'm in California, and feeling a bit overloaded by paper these days, so am not rushing off to order the report myself. Thanks, Jeffrey Hobson johobson [at] wheel.ucdavis.edu N Street Cohousing, Davis Energy Group
-
cohousing in Canada tom ponessa, January 23 1995
- Re: cohousing in Canada Jeffrey O. Hobson, February 2 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.