Re: Best Legal Structure for CoHo | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson WB0YQM (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 95 07:33 CST |
John Willson Cascade Cohousing Hobart, Australia JOHN.WILLSON [at] DELM.TAS.GOV.AU is the author of this message but due to a listserv problem it was posted by the COHOUSING-L sysop (Fred). **************** FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS ********************* >Hello, we at the Charlottesville,VA Co-Housing group would like advice on >the best way to legally structure our cohousing project. We are aware of a >number of ways, but which is best? > >1) Cooperative >2) Joint Corporation >3) Joint Venture/Limited partnership >4) Condominium > I suspect the Cooperative option or Condominium option are preferable. At Cascade Cohousing in Australia we looked we breifly looked at the options and decided on the Australian equivilent of condominium legal structure for when we are completed. This was chosen as it offers the greatest flexibility for the owners and banks understand the structure. While developing the site we are structured as a joint venture. There are a number of cohousing groups structured as cooperatives. This is arrangement works will if the individuals involved whish to have that type of structure. I think a corporation structure is complex and more expensive to administer and is not suited to a people based housing structure. A joint venture requires members of the group to have a high degree of trust in each other as there is more risk to each individual by actions of other individuals. John Willson Cascade Cohousing Hobart, Australia ------ Forwarded message ends here ------
-
Best Legal Structure for CoHo Anthony Lee, March 1 1995
- RE: Best Legal Structure for CoHo Mark Frauenglass, March 1 1995
- Re: Best Legal Structure for CoHo Fred H Olson WB0YQM, March 2 1995
- RE: Best Legal Structure for CoHo Rob Sandelin, March 2 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.