Suburbia's Anti-Social Housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Harry Pasternak (Harry_Pasternak![]() |
|
Date: 03 Aug 1995 01:51:38 GMT |
Couple days we had a dialogue about who was (is) responsible for the anti-social housing built in Suburbia after the second world war (and continues todayt). For those interested, read Anthony King's "The Bungalow". Not only will you find out how the bungalow was imported from rural Bengal and sweeps throughout North America from California to Florida, from Texas to Vancouver (and is copied by Frank Lloyd Wright). Yes, the front porch is there in all its glory. But most interesting was the comments about Suburbia when the "Ranch" style came in big. You know "the double garage with attached house". Here they are: "the linch pin of the contemporary capitalist economy...has been created and expanded through the total reorganization of the metropolitan built form so that it is all but impossible to live a "normal" social life without a car... A need has been created out of a luxury". and: "Developers saw that a homogeneous population and use of land were no less essential to suburban vision than a proper layout. Hence restrictions were decreed prohibiting blacks and orientals, and the fixing of minimum costs for houses in order to group the people more or less with like income together....in many cases outlawed all but single family housing" Suburbia was no accident and definitely not asked for by the middle class. Hitler couldn't have done it better. Harry Harry - via BulkRate 2.0
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.