Re: Building Community - social behavior | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: BM.Vornbrock (bmv![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 12:54:45 -0500 |
It has been a long, long time since I had time to read a Cohousing summary. My apologies for not re-introducing myself at this time. I'm here but have a very short amount of time. I want to expand on something that was written in this thread... THESHLIFE [at] aol.com wrote: > Religion is more normal than not-religion in the US. Check the stats. In my exposure to and review of those 'stats' I've discovered something rather startling. What is normal is to claim a religious affiliation. When the questions are refined to something approaching "do you consider yourself to actively be religious or spiritual?", the percentages shrink quickly to under 40%. They seem to have been fairly constant for much of the history of the United States. That seems to include the early time period where all colonial outposts tended to have a religious foundation. No surprise: so much of what is considered normal, isn't. So, I'd like to suggest that cohousing might be viewed as having a specific calling: people who wish to meet some of their needs for housing and community in a conciously created environment. Those who aren't interested won't come 'round. No matter how `normal' it might look. Barry Vornbrock
-
Re: Building Community - social behavior Shava Nerad, October 17 1995
- Re: Building Community - social behavior THESHLIFE, October 18 1995
- Re: Building Community - social behavior BM.Vornbrock, October 18 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.