Re: Site Driven CoHousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Cbwhy (Cbwhy![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 14:26:47 -0500 |
One of the most important things our group walked away from the conference with was that the location process can be long and painful. At present we are 3 households who all want community at almost any cost. We have already lost 2 households and it was a demoralizing experience. So- our land search was minimal. We settled on a piece of land already owned by one of our members because it certainly was as good as any other piece we've investigated- AND- we can control it quite easily. We felt, as Joani says, it would be easier to organize a group around the site than to risk losing future members during the process. Joani asks: >> And those of you who have been fortunate to start with a site, know how much easier it is to gain momentum and fill up your communities when your visions and fantasies are attached to a real physical place. Well- I'll let you know. In the last year we've only had one household totally commit without a site. I suspect that will change, as will our motivation to find members. Now that we have money down , the clock is ticking. We had our first on site potluck yesterday. Corey Yugler Broward Commons, Fl.
-
Site Driven CoHousing Joani Blank, October 17 1995
- Re: Site Driven CoHousing fmancino, October 18 1995
- Re: Site Driven CoHousing Cbwhy, October 23 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.