| Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Monty Berman (mberman |
|
| Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 09:00:36 -0600 | |
Michael's response to the self-interest dilemma is interesting and
creative, and looks like it could be a fun event. The piece I suggest adding
has to do with making sure, prior to getting rid of self-interest, to
first celebrate it. For me, what underlies acting from my self-interest
is the lack of having had significant others really interested in my
needs or wants, that is, in what I may have been experiencing. It's been
a great step forward for me to have become a champion for myself, and
pay/give myself the attention that I craved. It's also hard for me to see
the degree to which, at times, my self-attention excludes consideration
for others. Thus, I suggest that acting ONLY from one's self-interest
does not serve the person, nor can s/he feel good about it. I know I
would love to give up those things that I am unhealthily attached
to---and ususally only need an opportunity to do so. Of course, the
authenticity of this opportunity is crucial as is, I believe, the
respectfulness around it---which might be accomplished by all present
getting in touch with their own areas of self-interest which might be at the
expense of others.
So, prior to Michael's burning ceremony, some outrageous
role-playing of self-interest might be a fun preliminary.
Monty Berman, the First Residents Group, EcoVillage at Ithaca
On Tue, 5 Mar 1996, Michael John Omogrosso wrote:
> The name sharingwood has always brought a sense of harmony to this
> otherwise chaotic life. Is this a consensus group? If so a bit of
> rejuvination of the process retreat stlye might be in order.
>
> In like fashion, a festival of residents to remind all what brought youn
> together. Have a fetish ceremony where everyone makes a clay or wood
> energy retainer then pour your individual self interest into it and cast
> them into a bonding fire. Important to be the first to acknowledge some
> level of self interest (bound to have some, eh?) as an example.
>
> But what the hey, only you know the particulars.
>
> michael omogrosso
> om circle coordinator
> spirit booth
> oregon country fair
>
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody, (continued)
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Stuart Staniford-Chen, March 5 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Michael John Omogrosso, March 5 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody DebFlint, March 5 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Cohousing-L Listmgr, March 8 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Monty Berman, March 11 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Monty Berman, March 11 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.