Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Monty Berman (mberman![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 09:00:36 -0600 |
Michael's response to the self-interest dilemma is interesting and creative, and looks like it could be a fun event. The piece I suggest adding has to do with making sure, prior to getting rid of self-interest, to first celebrate it. For me, what underlies acting from my self-interest is the lack of having had significant others really interested in my needs or wants, that is, in what I may have been experiencing. It's been a great step forward for me to have become a champion for myself, and pay/give myself the attention that I craved. It's also hard for me to see the degree to which, at times, my self-attention excludes consideration for others. Thus, I suggest that acting ONLY from one's self-interest does not serve the person, nor can s/he feel good about it. I know I would love to give up those things that I am unhealthily attached to---and ususally only need an opportunity to do so. Of course, the authenticity of this opportunity is crucial as is, I believe, the respectfulness around it---which might be accomplished by all present getting in touch with their own areas of self-interest which might be at the expense of others. So, prior to Michael's burning ceremony, some outrageous role-playing of self-interest might be a fun preliminary. Monty Berman, the First Residents Group, EcoVillage at Ithaca On Tue, 5 Mar 1996, Michael John Omogrosso wrote: > The name sharingwood has always brought a sense of harmony to this > otherwise chaotic life. Is this a consensus group? If so a bit of > rejuvination of the process retreat stlye might be in order. > > In like fashion, a festival of residents to remind all what brought youn > together. Have a fetish ceremony where everyone makes a clay or wood > energy retainer then pour your individual self interest into it and cast > them into a bonding fire. Important to be the first to acknowledge some > level of self interest (bound to have some, eh?) as an example. > > But what the hey, only you know the particulars. > > michael omogrosso > om circle coordinator > spirit booth > oregon country fair >
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody, (continued)
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Stuart Staniford-Chen, March 5 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Michael John Omogrosso, March 5 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody DebFlint, March 5 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Cohousing-L Listmgr, March 8 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Monty Berman, March 11 1996
- Re: Dealing with self interest VS what's best for everybody Monty Berman, March 11 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.