Re: Examiner article/Fairfax "cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: MartyR707 (MartyR707![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 13:17:14 -0500 |
Hi, Just a quick reply to Rachel's post on a couple of points. first, we're probably very sensitive to "perception" here since we're just about to start the public hearing process in Sebastopol. One of the biggest "awful rumors" that was going around during our last try was that the houses had no kitchens! and therefore we were a bunch of hippies. Like it or not, "image" may have a lot to do with whether we get to build our project or not. The article referred to was about the *10 YEAR* battle with the neighbors to be allowed to build their project. Second, I thought part of the definition of cohousing was that it was designed and built by the residents and owned by them. This project is developer designed and built and I think the units are rentals. I have no problem with this whatsoever, just wasn't so sure it was cohousing. Lastly, in reference to Rachel's statement: <<Why assume that adults, single mothers or otherwise,who live cooperatively are "homeless people getting on their feet"? To be sure this may be true of some of these projects but not all. This phrasing implies that the cooperative situation is not intended to be a permanent home but merely a transitional state preceding something more respectable, such as separate housing. God forbid adults would choose to share a kitchen for any reason other than financial need.>> I *NEVER* said that people living cooperatively are homeless... etc. I referred to the particular program - Innovative Housing - which is based here and is used for that purpose at least in some cases. In fact, a friend of mine here on the Homeless Task Force, bought one of the houses for IH to use for homeless mothers. There is NOTHING negative intended in that statement - I think it's a great program. I have lived cooperatively for a good part of my life, shared many kitchens, and have no problem whatsoever with the lifestyle. My earlier post was just a casual response to the earlier question about the news article. I had not heard that there was cohousing in Fairfax, they have had no connection to our loose regional meetings and communications, I've not seen them on any lists of cohousing communities - forming, built, or otherwise - and was just surprised, that's all. Marty Roberts, Santa Rosa
-
Examiner article/Fairfax "cohousing MartyR707, April 24 1996
- Re: Examiner article/Fairfax "cohousing Rachel Freifelder, April 25 1996
- Re: Examiner article/Fairfax "cohousing MartyR707, April 25 1996
- Re: Examiner article/Fairfax "cohousing Stuart Staniford-Chen, April 25 1996
- Re: Examiner article/Fairfax "cohousing Michael Omogrosso, April 25 1996
- Re: Examiner article/Fairfax "cohousing zeitech, inc., April 29 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.