Re: will TIme requirements for first generation cohousing limit | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Tom Lent (tlent![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 17:26:47 -0500 |
Rob said: > I disagree that the group needs to be developers at all to form > community. I think that the best route to the future is to let > developers be developers and do that work, and have faciliated community > building happen amoung the residents, teach and learn group process and > decision making, do the design input work, but leave ALL the ugly legal, > permit, etc. details to other people and focus your group energy and > learning to be a group and building a sense of trust and community and > friendship amoung the group. > > Thoughts? I STRONGLY agree. I've been playing a central role in the development of the Berkeley cohousing project on Sacramento Street. It has been a fascinating process, in which I have learned much, but have also become quite burned out and risked my poor family for whom this is suppose to be a value. There has got to be a better way. I think leaving the development to professional developers is key. After all, we are after the dream community here, not the dream house and much of the development process gets us to bogged down in learning what we need to learn to make structures and making an infinite number of decisions that will have little to do with how strong the community is - but could make us go broke... ******************************************************************************* Tom Lent * 2220-A Sacramento St * Berkeley, CA 94702-1907 email: tlent [at] igc.apc.org * phone: 510/845-5243 *******************************************************************************
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.