| Rules about Amateurs on the list | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Thomas Alexander (70372.267 |
|
| Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 08:32:00 -0600 | |
I want to clarify the following which I said on the cohousing list. Based
on some responses I received in email, I think some have misunderstood.
I'd said:
<< I think there should be a rule against amateur anthropology on the
list. It's so hard not to respond to a quote like that.>>
One person replied:
>>No amateurs allowed?? Sortof the anti-Olympic ethic, eh? So, it's not
ok to
state one's opinion unless you're paid for it...hmmmm
I'll send you a bill for this post :) <<
Another person replied:
>>Umm, how 'bout a rule against *rules* like that?<<
If anybody thinks I was suggesting there REALLY should be a rule on
the list, I'm sorry not to have been more clear. Maybe I'm missing the
joke. (The first reply clearly is a joke.) Maybe others missed my joke.
I was suggesting there should be a rule to keep *ME* from filling the list
with discussions on topics other than cohousing. I could really talk all
day about some tangents which are brought up if I thought anybody was
interested. A rule to prevent what I was doing just then. Ha ha ha.
Ironic, eh. That's funny, get it? Uh, oh well, I guess you had to be
there.
Thos
Rochester, NY
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.