Discrimination? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Joani Blank (jeblank![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 02:23:49 -0600 |
At 08:20 AM 3/14/97 -0600, you wrote: > COHOUSING-L Digest 96 > >Topics covered in this issue include: I expect that the jury is still out on discrimination as far as membership in cohousing groups is concerned. That changes when the group dissolves and becomes a condominum (or planned unit develpment) homeowners association. At that point discrimination hypothetically becomes clearly unlawful. I say hypothetically, because in real life, cohousing units which turn over after the original batcg if owners have moved in quite often go to others already living in the community who want to move for any number of reasons, or they are offered to households on the group's waiting list" or friends and relatives of existing owners, before they are offered for public sale which is (as I understand it ) when anti-discrimination protections kick in in earnest. If I am competely off base about this I hope that someone will set me (and the rest of us) straight. Joani Blank Doyle St. CoHousing and Old Oakland CoHousing
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.