| Domes and Pattern Languages | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Thomas Alexander (Thos |
|
| Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:02:07 -0500 | |
Vinnay,
Me> Check out A Pattern Language and ask this question again.
You> I'm definitely feeling underinformed here!
Well, it's that I have carpal tunnel and try not to be too verbose.
>>I challenge the implicit assertion that domes are bad places.<<
I was responding to when you said that although following the
patterns may lead to superior social spaces...
>>The factors which make domes unsuitable for urban situations
are purely matters of conformity: in a community of dome houses,
a rectangular house would be quite unsuitable. I think that's
the only hitch. <<
What about square lots and linear roads?
>>I, personally, do not think I ever want to go back to living
in the city.<<
But the original question was whether domes were suitable for
cohousing - which is a high density application. Even in rural cohousing,
neighbors need to be close to each other and to the common house - often at
densities which would be high by urban standards.
>>To my eye, dome houses feel very large for the actual floorspace
enclosed. How you and I "feel space" may differ.<<
Do domes have high ceilings? That could make it feel large.
Still, I think you'll feel like you're stuck in the next room to your
housemates in a large feeling place, rather than being able to find your
own place in a large feeling longhouse.
>>I, personally, having contracted a healthy dislike of the
industrialised economy,<<
Ironic that industrial building and prefab dome components are your
way out -- but I ponder these things too, and probably agree with you.
I'll be moving to a new home soon - at a slight loss - to ensure that I'm
never tempted to buy a second car - or maybe even never fix the car we have
if it wears out.
>>Hm. That's very interesting. I rather like the way wooden
dwellings feel, but I suppose that's just a personal thing.<<
His reasons are sustainability and cost of lumber as a primary
material. He says it's quite suitiable for windows, door frames, etc.
>> I think you're overstating the case to suggest that a dome
house has "less than half the utility of a conventional home";<<
What I really mean to say is that a home built with close attention
to Alexander's patterns has at least twict the utility of a house built
without regard to them -- and further that it's difficult to pay close
attention to the patterns with a dome house.
I'd consider using a dome for a weekend cabin in the woods - but
not for any place with more than one house.
Thos
-
Domes and Pattern Languages Thomas Alexander, April 20 1997
- Re: Domes and Pattern Languages Vinay Gupta, April 21 1997
- Domes and Pattern Languages Thomas Alexander, April 22 1997
- Re: Domes and Pattern Languages Vinay Gupta, April 22 1997
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.