Re: Meeting Times | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: MLYNCHIN (MLYNCHIN![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 09:13:56 -0500 |
In a message dated 06.06.97 7:21:03 PM, you wrote: << We also do a LOT of discussion and other work over email, which frustrates some people - it's basically more meeting time. But it does do some things VERY efficiently. >> Can you elaborate on this point? Some people are more email-oriented than verbal, and the meeting time doesn't allow for these people to process in "real time." Other folks are not email-oriented and only want announcements, especially if it's a work eddress. But the time between meetings is a little too long and allows for unresolved feelings to fester. I can see it in people's body language. But perhaps email discussions, no matter the good intentions, perhaps just flame the controversy rather than enlighten. Everyone interprets email postings differently. I feel quite inhibited at the meetings due to the limited time and the number of people. The verbally-oriented tend to have their say no matter how short the meetings, but they also seem frustrated. There is so much to talk about, but no time to talk about them. I know it will be different once we all move in, and we certainly won't be using email to communicate, but it seems pretty slim communication now unless you're on the phone every night with each household. Marilyn
-
Meeting Times MLYNCHIN, June 6 1997
- Re: Meeting Times Denise Meier and/or Michael Jacob, June 6 1997
- Re: Meeting Times MLYNCHIN, June 8 1997
- Re: Meeting Times Raymond D. Gasser, June 8 1997
- RE: Meeting Times Rob Sandelin, June 11 1997
- RE: Meeting Times Chris Chrysostom, June 12 1997
- Re: Meeting Times Chris Chrysostom, June 12 1997
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.