| Re: Christian Cohousing & Diversity | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Merlin Porter-Borden (merlpb |
|
| Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 07:28:27 -0500 | |
At risk of being redundant, I assert that the greatest impact is
economic to a forming community requiring alignment with any ideology:
the source of members is restricted; however, with sufficient members,
such as with the Mennonites or Bretheren (LaVerne, CA), this is a not a
concern or a factor. But, Per McCamant & Durrett, the idealogical
requirement had a significant ecomonic impact on the Danish community of
Overdrevet (p.63), probably because they had no group already formed:
they had to recruit from a reduced market.
The Overdrevet experience seems, to me, to indicate that a strong
ideological "mood," could create an intensity which works counter to
creating consensus, while a formal idealogy, such as the with the
Mennonites, could create a framework for community formation (given that
recruitment was not a problem).
Have Fun.
Merlin Porter-Borden
Liberty Village of Maryland
Pet Peeve: The North American cohouser wanabees who blindly
recreate the cohousing wheel without first exploring the Danish
experience through the MacCamant and Durrett book.
- Re: Christian Cohousing & Diversity, (continued)
- Re: Christian Cohousing & Diversity Documania, September 6 1997
- Re: Christian Cohousing & Diversity THESHLIFE, September 7 1997
- Re: Christian Cohousing & Diversity Catherine Harper, September 7 1997
- RE: Christian Cohousing & Diversity Rob Sandelin, September 7 1997
- Re: Christian Cohousing & Diversity Merlin Porter-Borden, September 8 1997
- Re: Christian Cohousing & Diversity Gorwydd, September 10 1997
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.