Re: compromising the term | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Scott Cowley (scowley![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 10:36:21 -0600 |
Well, here we go, ready to "compromise the term"... For what ? The sake of other, more "important" values like "christian" community ? Why not try attracting others on the basis of 1) It's not a commune, 2) It is a roof over your head 3) It is a MODERN form of community 4) It respects modern principles of environment: sharing and efficient use of natural resources, 5) It respects modern principles of Democracy, 6) It respects modern principles of Justice and fairness. 7) It transcends the limits of archaic religions. For Bill and Allen: "We" don't "have the responsibility to keep our doors open to all". We have the responsibility to stick to our values. Zippity Doo Dah...
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.