Re: Unit Selection | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Judy Baxter (BAXTER![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 15:16:56 -0600 |
Joani wrote: <In Old Oakland, our situation is different. We are building 20 units and just acquired our 20th member household. But we don't yet have unit prices--though we have fairly close estimates--and our design has not yet been absolutely finalized nor yet approved by the Department of Real Estate, so we cannot make official reservations. However, we have done some mock picks with us each stating our first, second and third choices and lining all these up on a chart by seniority. There are two or three households near the bottom of the list, who may end up with no unit that will work for them which they can afford. Can you help us with suggestions for an equitable unit selection process? Unfortunately, the limits of our building don't give us as much flexibility as might be desirable, and we have 10 different unit types among these 20 units. Some in our group think we should have a mock pick and then discuss as a group which households are willing to take a second or third choice to accommodate those lower on the list who otherwise won't be able to live with us.>> At Monterey Cohousing we had somewhat of a similar situation - the "Big Building" had space for 6-9 units according to how we divided up the space, and people had to be willing to move in before renovation, and live through it, with different spaces needing more or less work. And we couldn't carry the project without full occupancy, to be able to build the planned townhouses. To be truthful, (it is 5 years ago!!) i have forgotten the details, and we went through it twice, before and after we "lost and regained" the property. But people understood the situation, and some stepped forward to adjust to make the dream possible. I would try some process that encourages adjustments, similar to your mention of taking 2nd or 3rd choice. Maybe some people are willing. I would not be living where I am (with it's pros and cons) if I had not been encouraged to change my concept of what would work. And now, tho there might be good reasons to switch, i'm very attached. Judy Judy Baxter, Monterey Cohousing Community,(MoCoCo) Twin Cities Area, Mpls.,MN -- e-mail: baxter [at] epivax.epi.umn.edu 15 homes - 7 new townhomes and 8 coop apartments in a rehab Georgian building built as a retirement home in 1924 - Coming up for 5 year anniversary of purchase and 1st moveins. Voice Mail for Monterey Cohousing - 612-930-7554
-
Unit selection Joani Blank, November 12 1997
- RE: Unit selection Landress, Scott (CICG - NY Mortgages), November 12 1997
- Re: Unit selection Jim Snyder-Grant, November 12 1997
- Re: Unit Selection Judy Baxter, November 14 1997
- Re: Unit selection MartyR707, January 20 1999
- Unit selection Ruth Hirsch, November 16 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.