RE: Choosing and working with a builder | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Snyder-Grant (jimsg![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 11:37:07 -0600 |
At New View (Acton MA) we had a system like this. A volunteer trioka: 1 person to take calls or receieve letters from community members (and all the phone calls were written up on little 'issue' forms). One person who was the building expert, who helped decide if the issue was complex or contentious enough to go to some committee or professional, and a third person who met with the builder on a regular basis to go over the issues that got through the first couple of filters. One of those poeple also got back to households about their issues - I forget who. There originally was a 'development committee' which did all the heavy negotiating and budgeting and coordinating before the construction started: but the committee fell apart slowly, afterwards. This troike was a response to the coordinating work that was not getting done. Observation: the sort of people who volunteer and do well at the intense 'heroic' work of development are often very distinct from the sort of people who volunteer and do well at more ongoing 'maintaining' work. We've seen a big turnover in who is working a lot, now that we live here. -Jim Snyder-Grant New View Acton MA jimsg [at] hotmail.com Jim_Snyder-Grant [at] NewView.org >From: "Rob Sandelin" <Floriferous [at] classic.msn.com> >Subject: RE: Choosing and working with a builder >X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0 -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas >X-Comment: Developing cohousing - collaborative housing communities > >One idea I heard from someplace or another, create a committee of people to be >the building laison folks, and then allow members to submit requests, ideas, >etc. to the building, via the committee on 3X5 index cards. This way there is >a paper trail of people's issues. The committee reviews them, and then returns >it (with an explaination of why it aint going to the the builder) or passes it >up to the builder, who then deals with it. You don't get many of these, maybe >a couple dozen and it makes a record for you to ensure that, yes Rob, we did >so deal with your issue. > >Rob Sandelin >Sharingwood Cohousing >Where there is still one excellent built home for sale, and a couple of >building lots. > > --- jimsg [at] hotmail.com Jim Snyder-Grant (please excuse mandatory ad appended by my email provider) ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-
Choosing and working with a builder Dahako, January 13 1998
- RE: Choosing and working with a builder Rob Sandelin, January 14 1998
- RE: Choosing and working with a builder Jim Snyder-Grant, January 14 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.