RE: labor credit / Twin Oaks | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (Floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 23:47:16 -0600 |
An enthusiastic member tried out a small scale system of this called Sharingbucks, which was sort of a internal money system for bartering. It never went anywhere. My own take on it was that quantifying it was annoying. If I want to give time to someone, then I do so. If I have some skill they need I am usually happy to share it without thinking about its "value" and getting a "fair return" . I reccomend that communties that are built making a mimimum hourly requirement of all members, and then charging $10 and hour for those that do not participate the required hours. Then you can use the $10 an hour to hire somebody else, or let the non-participant pay someone else directly the $10 an hour to do their minimum hours for them. I would also make accounting systems annual rather than monthly. This way low participation one month can be averaged out with high participation another month. At Sharingwood we require members to contribute 2 hours a month on a team. This is 24 hours a year, a very small amount, but its also something like 60 people hours a month, which is a fair amount of human capital. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood
-
Re: labor credit / Twin Oaks Robert Schrader, January 16 1998
- Re: labor credit / Twin Oaks Ann, January 16 1998
- RE: labor credit / Twin Oaks Rob Sandelin, January 17 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.