Re: Renters | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Joani Blank (jeblank![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 03:25:20 -0600 |
Most cohousing being created in the U.S.today is new construction or retrofit requiring so much renovation that it is almost as expensive as new construction. [In the S.F. Bay area renovation usually costs more than new construction in part because of the substantial cost of making older buildings earthquake-damage resistant.] . And Denise is quite right in thinking that no one is likely to want to pay these market rate or higher prices AND "participate" in all the anguish just to be a landlord. (Of course if such a household joins the group really late, say during construction, the bulk of the hard work has been done by others already.) However, I can certainly see households buying a unit in a coho community with an in-law unit attached which they can rent, or a single person buying a unit with the intention of having one or more housemates (who would be renters). Then there are people who may wish to invest in a unit which. for whatever reason, they can't live in right now, so they buy in with the intention of renting to another household for several years before they are ready to move in. Then there are those who go away for several months or maybe even a couple of years, say to go into the Peace Corps, and rent their units while they are gone. At Doyle Street, policies for renters are written into our CC and Rs, and we recently expanded them to deal with owners who share their units with one or more renters/housemates. In addition, we have all signed participation agreements, in which we commit not to rent or sell our units to anyone who will not agree to be a participating member of the community, this means cooking common meals, being on committees, and attending meetings, although decisions relating to assessments and budget are reserved to homeowners. As to someone's concerns that renters will not be as respectful of the property or as concerned about it, I think there is enough experience in cohousing to strongly suggest that when in Rome, most people do as the Romans, and when renters and owners all know one another quite well, as we typically do in cohousing, there is a sense of belonging and "ownership" of the community life, that is shared to some extent by everyone who lives there. Whether someone owns or rents his/her home seems unrelated to how engaged that person is in the life of the community. Perhaps this "good" state of affairs would deteriorate if too high a proportion of the households were renters, but I'd be loathe to predict where that threshold is. I, for one, hope that ten years down the road there will be more rental opportunities in cohousing both in absolute numbers, and in proportion to the number homeowners in any given community. Joani Blank Doyle Street and Old Oakland Cohousings, SF Bay Area. Only one more unit--two enclosed bedrooms and large sleeping loft, 1172 sq ft.--available for reservation in Old Oakland/Swan's Market. Construction to begin this month. Move-in projected for Feb-Mar, 1999
-
Renters Ed Cynewski, February 1 1998
- Re: Renters Kevin Wolf, February 1 1998
- Re: Renters Smith & McGowan, February 6 1998
- Re: Renters Denise Meier and/or Michael Jacob, February 6 1998
- Re: Renters Joani Blank, February 7 1998
- Re: Renters Eleanor Chandler, February 9 1998
- RE: Renters Rob Sandelin, February 9 1998
- RE: Renters Rob Sandelin, February 9 1998
- Re: renters Lynn Nadeau, March 4 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.