| Re: M Henner & community service quibbles (fwd) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Fred H. Olson (fholson |
|
| Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 11:08:13 -0500 | |
ruddick [at] edison.cc.oh.us
is the author of the message below but due to a problem it was posted
by the Fred the list manager: owner-cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org
-------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS --------------------
I understand M Henner's resrvations about using "community service"
hours for enterprises that may be of benefit to a group of individuals but
not society in general.
I am not certain that those reservations apply to cohousing.
While the primary beneficiaries of cohousing are the occupants,
I think we could make a case that cohousing as a movement offers
considerable potential to improve the conditions of people in general.
I am also uncertain if there is such a clear distinction between
community-service and total selflessness. How many not-for-profits
are run by people with six (or seven!) figure salaries?
I think the community service idea could be presented to the
court administrators. They are the ones who should decide if a particular
cohousing community fits their criteria or not. Service to that part
of the community just might be as relevant as service to any other part.
TR
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.