RE: Oh, no! (Ceilings Div) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Matt Lawrence (matt![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 15:37:16 -0500 |
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Rob Sandelin wrote: > Yes, I think the height of the Sharingwood ceiling is very nice, not too > high, > not too low (7 foot at the outside wall edge, 14 feet at the peak. Your definition of "one story" and mine probably differ a bit. I think eight ft. is way too low for any good sized room. I'd probably go with at least 10' or do a sloping ceiling (which I think is the best looking). > IF YOU COULD HAVE A TWO-STORY DINING ROOM, WITH STATE > OF THE ART ACOUSTICS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST, WOULD YOU TAKE IT? > > Absolutely not. Its not only acoustics, its visual space. Your living room at > home does not have a 25 foot ceiling, nor should your commonhouse. Unless > your Well, I could see a two-story roof be as low as 17' it theere was just a loft overlooking the downstairs. I think some very interesting things could be done with that sort of configuration. -- Matt
-
Oh, no! (Ceilings Div) Paul Kilduff, June 17 1998
- Re: Oh, no! (Ceilings Div) Elana Kann, June 18 1998
- RE: Oh, no! (Ceilings Div) Rob Sandelin, June 18 1998
- RE: Oh, no! (Ceilings Div) Matt Lawrence, June 18 1998
- RE: Oh, no! (Ceilings Div) Catherine Harper, June 18 1998
- Re: Oh, no! (Ceilings Div) Joani Blank, June 19 1998
- RE: Oh, no! (Ceilings Div) Paul Kilduff, June 21 1998
- Re: Oh, no! (Ceilings Div) Paul Kilduff, June 21 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.