Re: Sidewalk material | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H. Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 13:20:40 -0500 |
Rob Tom, Kanata, Ontario, Canada rob_tom [at] freenet.carleton.ca is the author of the message below but due to a problem it was posted by the Fred the list manager: owner-cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- > >robin.ellison [at] dartmouth.edu wrote: > >> you really need concrete. I know it has more runoff, but I >>think the tradeoff is worth it. Hello Robin and ValueSeekers; I've not been following this thread so apologies if the following is off-base. >From what little I have read, it appears that the choice of what to place over the earth has been limited to "lawn" or "hard surface paving", neither of which strike me as being very thoughtful solutions and are certainly far from being "Green". The only place that I can think of where one really "needs" concrete is for a structural floor slab that is suspended in the air, as in a skyscraper... and presumably we are not talking skyscrapers here. There are are various low-impact means to alter the makeup of existing soils so that they become suitable for heavy foot/vehicular traffic. One that I'm aware of is psyllium-based and marketed in the US under the name of "Stabilizer". Another that I've recently come across is a product marketed under the name "EcoCrete" (yes, they have a website). Both of the above soil additives are capable of making surfaces which are suitable for heavy vehicles at substantially lower cost (dollar- wise and environmental impact-wise) Again, not knowing the site/application, the following may be inappropriate but "Woodchips" are another oft-overlooked option that I think deserves more attention. Woodchips (as may be obtained for free from tree care companies) are usually taken to landfills and disposed of along with other municipal waste, which IMO is a sin. When spread over the earth in a layer 6-8 or more inches thick, the woodchips provide a resilient surface which is a pleasure to walk on, capable of supporting vehicles (even heavy trucks) on otherwise impassable soggy terrain, does not pose an hindrance to wheelchairs and bicycles, and of course, does not bruise the knees and faces of Little Ones who invariably find ways to challenge gravity. -- Rob Tom ---------- * ------------ be417 [at] FreeNet.Carleton.ca Kanata, Ontario, Canada
-
Re: sidewalk material Fred H. Olson, October 15 1998
- Re: sidewalk material Fred H. Olson, October 16 1998
- Re: Sidewalk material Fred H. Olson, October 17 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.