Composting Toilets | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Abrams (jabrams![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 08:28:16 -0600 |
Buzz Burrell wrote: >Composting Toliets are a big issue. There is a huge range of models with >very different designs, intended uses, and price ranges. I'd like to expand a bit on Buzz's remarks. Yes, big issue. We have installed and lived with many composting toilets. We're currently in the earliest construction phase of the Island Cohousing Project (16 homes + Common House + shop/office development on adjacent property). All buildings will use composting toilets. We have done some exhaustive research and inquiries, and agree with Buzz that Phoenix, Carousel, and Clivus are the manufacturers who are making good products that can serve real buildings well. After looking at all the products that are available in this country,we feel those threeare offering the most viable products for other than vacation homes or very low demand uses. Buzz mentions Sustainable Strategies as a good source for consulting. They are, but they are also one of the manufacturers (Carousel). Carol Steinfeld is writing a book about composters, and recently wrote a good article in the July/August 98 issue of Environmental Design and Construction (201-291 9001, www.edcmag.com). Environmental Building News wrote a detailed review of the Phoenix in its June 98 issue ( 802- 257-7300, www.ebuild.com). Composters work fine. The real issue is this: There are three potential products that come from a house equipped with a composter: 1. The solids (which get composted by the composter); 2. The liquid end product that collects at the bottom of the composter; and 3. The greywater that comes from dishwashing, clothes washing, showers, etc. All have useful nutrients and all become concentrated pollutants if just poured into the ground or a sewer. The key is to develop a system that deals well with all three. So a composter is only a part of a system. Completing the system is a trick - filled with biological, technical, and regulatory hurdles. Different states have different regulatory attitudes and hurdles. Different sites and different climates pose diverse challenges. At this stage of the game the composting part is far more coherent and worked out than the other two aspects. I would suggest that anyone who wants to take a systems approach to this should choose one of the three companies mentioned (Sustainable Strategies, David DelPorto, 978-369 9440, in Massachusetts; Phoenix, Glen Nelson, 406-862-3854, in Montana; or Clivus Multrum USA, Don Mills, 800-425-4887, in Massachusetts) and work through these issues with them and a forward looking, clever civil engineer. All three companies are addressing the issues I've mentioned in different ways and all continue to make progress. In our case, we have found that it has been necessary, in order to understand our options and achieve our goals, to do some basic engineering on our own and bring in a variety of experts. I can't tell you what will result from this process (we're in the middle of it now), but I will try to report further at a later date. John Abrams South Mountain Co., Inc. and Island Cohousing, West Tisbury, MA (where infrastructure improvements and land clearing have begun, and we're well on our way to . . . )
-
Re: composting toilets Karen Schwalbe, October 29 1998
- Composting Toilets John Abrams, October 30 1998
- Re: composting toilets Hartzell Family, October 30 1998
- Re: composting toilets Fred H. Olson, August 23 1999
- composting toilets Gary Kent, November 22 2001
- Composting toilets Neena Jud, December 19 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.