Re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled
From: Fred H. Olson (fholsoncohousing.org)
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 07:46:38 -0600
On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, Diane Simpson wrote:

> Under the current definition, a "cohousing
> community for people who want to live and work with people who have
> disabilities" would not be cohousing at all, it would be an intentional
> community.

Diane, isn't this a needlessly inflexible response?  You don't make clear 
how you think the proposed community would differ from "the current
definition".  I can imagine a community as described that I would consider
consider cohousing.  I can also imagine an comunity designed and
operated a non resident based organization that I would not
consider cohousing tho cohousing-like.  I suspect that the resident
organized community would be harder to make happen.

Fred

--
Fred H. Olson  fholson [at] cohousing.org    Minneapolis,MN   55411  
(612)588-9532  Amateur radio: WB0YQM          List manager of:
Cohousing-L  See http://www.cohousing.org and Nbhd-tc --  Twin 
Cities Neighborhood issues list.  See http://freenet.msp.mn.us

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.