Re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H. Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 07:46:38 -0600 |
On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, Diane Simpson wrote: > Under the current definition, a "cohousing > community for people who want to live and work with people who have > disabilities" would not be cohousing at all, it would be an intentional > community. Diane, isn't this a needlessly inflexible response? You don't make clear how you think the proposed community would differ from "the current definition". I can imagine a community as described that I would consider consider cohousing. I can also imagine an comunity designed and operated a non resident based organization that I would not consider cohousing tho cohousing-like. I suspect that the resident organized community would be harder to make happen. Fred -- Fred H. Olson fholson [at] cohousing.org Minneapolis,MN 55411 (612)588-9532 Amateur radio: WB0YQM List manager of: Cohousing-L See http://www.cohousing.org and Nbhd-tc -- Twin Cities Neighborhood issues list. See http://freenet.msp.mn.us
-
CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled RaynMom2, February 21 1999
- re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled Maren Leyla Cooke, February 22 1999
- Re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled RaynMom2, February 22 1999
- Re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled Diane Simpson, February 22 1999
- Re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled Fred H. Olson, February 23 1999
- Re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled Unnat, February 23 1999
- Re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled Diane Simpson, February 25 1999
- Re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled Fred H. Olson, February 26 1999
- Re: CoHousing to Meet Needs of Disabled kchung, October 16 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.