Re: Consensus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Randi Baird (dune![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 12:46:13 -0600 |
Stephanie, Our group at Island Cohousing, LLC. in Massachusetts utilizes consensus for all decision making with a fall-back 75% vote. We define consensus as unanimity of individual members. If unanimity can't be reached during two consecutive meetings separated by 24 hours the issue then requires an affirmative 75% vote of the member households. Each household (owner occupied) is afforded one vote regardless of the household's size and it's up to each household to determine how they will vote, other wise they must abstain from the vote. Renters and assoicated members can be involved in discussions but can't block consensus or vote. In our experience consensus has provided our group with the ability to work through issues no matter how large or small, important or insignificant, without ever having to fall-back to a vote in 3 years. Philippe Jordi, Island Cohousing Randi Baird email: dune [at] vineyard.net
- consensus, (continued)
- consensus Stephanie Fassnacht, March 4 1999
- Re: consensus John Sechrest, March 4 1999
- Re: consensus Unnat, March 4 1999
- Consensus Joani Blank, March 5 1999
- Re: Consensus Randi Baird, March 7 1999
- Consensus Catya Belfer-Shevett, June 6 2000
- Re: Consensus Howard Landman, June 6 2000
- RE: Consensus Catya Belfer-Shevett, June 6 2000
- consensus Timothy Clark, February 7 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.