Re: Cohousing in Santa Barbara...NOT! (yet) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Eris Weaver (eris![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 15:31:29 -0600 (MDT) |
> 2. Real estate costs here are obscene. > 3. Suitable sites for building are scarce. While these are certainly sizeable obstacles, they are not insurmountable. (We are in the North SF Bay Area, with very similar parameters. There are already two other cohousing groups in various stages of move-in in our county, and ours is making headway on finding a site.) > 5. Retrofit vs. new development. Can't answer that question for another group, but our group is currently leaning heavily toward the retrofit model for a number of reasons -- predominately cost & time. > 6. What should I do? > c) email everybody on the list and convene a meeting. C) would get my vote. While email is a useful tool for communication and our group uses it quite a bit, it's not enough without some face-to-face...after all, you're talking about living with these people! You've said that you don't want to "drive this thing"...be forewarned, creating cohousing takes A LOT OF WORK by a committed core group of people, and while it certainly helps to have a couple of energetic leader-types, no one person can "drive" -- it's a group effort! Eris Weaver Sonoma County Cohousing http://www.wco.com/~eris/socoho.html
-
Cohousing in Santa Barbara...NOT! (yet) Gary D. Shapiro, August 13 1999
- Re: Cohousing in Santa Barbara...NOT! (yet) Eris Weaver, August 13 1999
- Re: Cohousing in Santa Barbara...NOT! (yet) Gary D. Shapiro, August 14 1999
- RE: Cohousing in Santa Barbara...NOT! (yet) Rob Sandelin, August 14 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.