Re: retrofit cohousing vs co-nbhd [ was: Re: mythological | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H. Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 12:22:00 -0600 (MDT) |
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Sanda Everette wrote: > So Fred, > In rereading your definition, I am trying to decide whether I am > correctly using the term describing my project. I did adapt the term > after reading about N St. Cohousing. In your definition, you mention > "retrofiting the social relations between people who live in close > proximity in existing housing. " I see us doing that except I question > whether you mean with the people already living in that existing housing > or with people you attract to the existing housing who want to change > their social relations to be more like cohousing. In our case, people > have been asked to leave...or moved on their own when they saw what was > happening...to create space for people who want to live in community. > Hi Sanda, I would definitely consider what you are doing with San Mateo Cooperative Community to be an example of 'retrofit cohousing'. You do bring up an interesting dimension that I did not intend to address in my definition tho - namely whether residents moved to the community to participate in the community or whether they lived there before. With few exceptions including in examples of retrofit cohousing that I know about, people move to a cohousing community because of their desire to participate and live this way. This is how the self-selection process is actually implemented. Not everyone desires to live with the close cooperative relationships that cohousing implies. This self-selection results in more consensus about and enthusiasm to implement various community endeavors. This also relates to the recent thread on Cohousing-L about 'Circumstantial Community'. Communities that do not have this self-selection process are inherently less likely to achieve the same level intensity of community. The one exception that I know of is my community to which I have sometimes applied the term retrofit cohousing. We (my wife and I) chose to organize in the neighborhood where we have lived for 20+ years. Since there are few turnovers in the owner-occupied single family homes here, we are working with people who already live here. We hope to have some people move here to participate ** but there will be few for a long time. We happen to have great neighbors who share many goals of community building tho for them these goals are generally not as high a priority as for typical cohousers. ** We currently have 3 households interested in the second house that my wife and I own so we potentially face the problem of deciding who gets it! Fred Homewood Cohousing http://freenet.msp.mn.us/housing/cohousing/homewood -- Fred H. Olson fholson [at] cohousing.org Minneapolis,MN 55411 (612)588-9532 Amateur radio: WB0YQM List manager of: Cohousing-L See http://www.cohousing.org and Nbhd-tc -- Twin Cities Neighborhood issues list. See http://freenet.msp.mn.us
-
Re: retrofit cohousing vs co-nbhd [ was: Re: mythological Steve Habib Rose, August 16 1999
- Re: retrofit cohousing vs co-nbhd [ was: Re: mythological Fred H. Olson, August 22 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.