Re: Failure of cohousing as communties: ad hoc research | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Hans Tilstra (hanstilstra![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 18:38:23 -0600 (MDT) |
Do successful cohousing projects have a historic path in common? ie. which motive works best? (from p. 205 in McCamant & Durrett's Cohousing) - the family angle ("Get Real in Alameda") - an ecological focus ("Ecocity Berkeley") - an can't afford economic focus ("Oakland Artists & Writers United", can't afford otherwise) - an amenities focus ("Live it Up in Hercules"; we can afford more if...) Also, does the environment affect the success of the project? Is a suburban project more vulnerable than a rural one? If the place you live in offers work for both, does that slow turnover? Hans Tilstra www.vicnet.net.au/~cohouse/
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.