Re: design review | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Bitner/Stevenson (lilbert![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 18:53:55 -0700 (MST) |
> THIS MESSAGE IS IN MIME FORMAT. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --MS_Mac_OE_3028469942_988738_MIME_Part Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit I am surprised that you were allowed to build only 15 garages for the whole community. I guess you have parking for everyone else, regardless of whether it's covered. I think there's a good lesson here. So many of us get caught up in the ideal that we read about, and don't really think about the reality. I think this goes along with the other thread about cohousing not being magic. It's so hard to keep your feet on the ground when your dreams take flight! -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California ---------- From: PattyMara [at] aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <cohousing-l [at] freedom2.mtn.org> Subject: Re: design review Date: Sun, Dec 19, 1999, 8:17 PM Here, we designed 15 garages in for a community of 27 homes. Now there are 3 households who very very much want a garage and cannot have one because they bought in after all garages were reserved. At Tierra Nueva there was and still is a stigma attached to wanting a garage for a *car* and *storage of stuff* probably based on some nebulous ideal of voluntary simplicity. So we didn't build a garage for every house. I wish we would have built more garages though, that were designed and engineered better. --MS_Mac_OE_3028469942_988738_MIME_Part Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Re: design review</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY BGCOLOR=3D"#FFFFFF"> <FONT SIZE=3D"2">I am surprised that you were allowed to build only 15 garage= s for the whole community. I guess you have parking for everyone else,= regardless of whether it's covered. <BR> <BR> I think there's a good lesson here. So many of us get caught up in the idea= l that we read about, and don't really think about the reality. I think this= goes along with the other thread about cohousing not being magic. It's so h= ard to keep your feet on the ground when your dreams take flight!<BR> -- <BR> Liz Stevenson<BR> Southside Park Cohousing<BR> Sacramento, California<BR> <BR> ----------<BR> From: PattyMara [at] aol.com<BR> To: Multiple recipients of list <cohousing-l [at] freedom2.mtn.org><BR> Subject: Re: design review<BR> Date: Sun, Dec 19, 1999, 8:17 PM<BR> </FONT><BR> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE><TT> Here, we designed 15 garages in for a community of 27= homes. Now <BR> there are 3 households who very very much want a garage and cannot have one= <BR> because they bought in after all garages were reserved. <BR> <BR> At Tierra Nueva there was and still is a stigma attached to wanting a garag= e <BR> for a *car* and *storage of stuff* probably based on some nebulous ideal of= <BR> voluntary simplicity. So we didn't build a garage for every hou= se. I wish <BR> we would have built more garages though, that were designed and engineered = <BR> better.<BR> </TT></BLOCKQUOTE> </BODY> </HTML> --MS_Mac_OE_3028469942_988738_MIME_Part--
- Re: design review, (continued)
- Re: design review Howard Landman, December 16 1999
- Re: design review Berrins, December 17 1999
- Re: design review PattyMara, December 19 1999
- Re: design review Unnat, December 19 1999
- Re: design review Bitner/Stevenson, December 19 1999
- Re: design review Marya S. Tipton, December 19 1999
- Re: design review Kay Argyle, December 22 1999
- Re: design review Bitner/Stevenson, December 22 1999
- Re: design review Marya S. Tipton, December 22 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.