Re: defining the cohousing principle | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Berrins (Berrins![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:03:26 -0600 (MDT) |
Perhaps one way (of many possible) to redefine the "cohousing principle" is to place less emphasis on the physical structures and layout of the community. At present, cohousing is costly because of how it's built. Either you buy undeveloped land and develop it or retrofit existing buildings and the surrounding lots to get as close to the ideal physical set-up as possible. Several general physical concepts predominate; perimeter parking with no driveways or roads between houses, a Common House with several specific function rooms, preservation of open land, clustered houses that face each other, and a bunch more. All of these cost cash money. Unless you can find a funding source to GIVE you money (and kudos to those who've succeeded), the community members have to fork it up. Once you've got the land to develop or the buildings to retrofit, you can either build or retrofit as cheaply as possible, let everyone build their own house, or go for some middle road, which is what most folks do. For the purpose of this discussion, let's stick with building cheaply. To build (or retrofit) cheaply, you have to either buy cheap materials, build simply or retrofit as little as possible, supply as much labor as you can, or all three. This will still be too expensive for some folks, either in time or money or both. So, for folks who don't have enough time or money to do any of the above, how can we make cohousing affordable? One answer, as suggested above, is to eliminate building from scratch or retrofitting altogether. Find a pre-existing neighborhood, have members move into the as soon as a house or apartment becomes available and work towards eventually having some kind of common space or house. You don't even have to own anything. Then consider all the non-physical ideals of cohousing and do what you can to organize and live them. Share meals, share tools, machinery and expertise, watch each others kids, have games nights, meetings where you plan events, and so on. Tear down the fences and set up the connecting backyards for community life. Sharing stuff will save folks money, and community fundraisers can get a bit of extra cash. You may not have the physical ideal, but you will have a community. Roger Berman Pathways Northampton, MA This, by the way, is the only way I can think of to pass cohousing ideals to most of the rest of the world.
-
defining the cohousing principle Victoria, April 2 2000
- Re: defining the cohousing principle Berrins, April 13 2000
- defining the cohousing principle Tara Ingram, April 13 2000
- Re: defining the cohousing principle Kevin Wolf, April 13 2000
- RE: defining the cohousing principle Rob Sandelin, May 1 2000
- RE: defining the cohousing principle Fred H. Olson, May 1 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.