| Re: defining the cohousing principle | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Berrins (Berrins |
|
| Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:03:26 -0600 (MDT) | |
Perhaps one way (of many possible) to redefine the "cohousing principle" is
to place less emphasis on the physical structures and layout of the
community.
At present, cohousing is costly because of how it's built. Either you buy
undeveloped land and develop it or retrofit existing buildings and the
surrounding lots to get as close to the ideal physical set-up as possible.
Several general physical concepts predominate; perimeter parking with no
driveways or roads between houses, a Common House with several specific
function rooms, preservation of open land, clustered houses that face each
other, and a bunch more.
All of these cost cash money. Unless you can find a funding source to GIVE
you money (and kudos to those who've succeeded), the community members have
to fork it up. Once you've got the land to develop or the buildings to
retrofit, you can either build or retrofit as cheaply as possible, let
everyone build their own house, or go for some middle road, which is what
most folks do. For the purpose of this discussion, let's stick with building
cheaply.
To build (or retrofit) cheaply, you have to either buy cheap materials, build
simply or retrofit as little as possible, supply as much labor as you can, or
all three. This will still be too expensive for some folks, either in time
or money or both. So, for folks who don't have enough time or money to do
any of the above, how can we make cohousing affordable?
One answer, as suggested above, is to eliminate building from scratch or
retrofitting altogether. Find a pre-existing neighborhood, have members
move into the as soon as a house or apartment becomes available and work
towards eventually having some kind of common space or house. You don't even
have to own anything.
Then consider all the non-physical ideals of cohousing and do what you can to
organize and live them. Share meals, share tools, machinery and expertise,
watch each others kids, have games nights, meetings where you plan events,
and so on. Tear down the fences and set up the connecting backyards for
community life. Sharing stuff will save folks money, and community
fundraisers can get a bit of extra cash. You may not have the physical
ideal, but you will have a community.
Roger Berman
Pathways
Northampton, MA
This, by the way, is the only way I can think of to pass cohousing ideals to
most of the rest of the world.
-
defining the cohousing principle Victoria, April 2 2000
- Re: defining the cohousing principle Berrins, April 13 2000
- defining the cohousing principle Tara Ingram, April 13 2000
- Re: defining the cohousing principle Kevin Wolf, April 13 2000
- RE: defining the cohousing principle Rob Sandelin, May 1 2000
- RE: defining the cohousing principle Fred H. Olson, May 1 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.