Re: Why cohousing should not be mission driven to be affordable housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Robyn Williams (zen![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 06:34:39 -0700 (MST) |
(Sorry Rob, I meant this to go to the list.) I appear to be living in one of the few rental based cohousing projects in the world, so please remember Pinakarri Community as a drop in the ocean of possibility. We have on site, 8 publicly funded rental homes (our common house was built by trimming the construction budget for each rental house) and 4 privately owned homes. We also having members and supporters living next door and near-by in owned or rented houses. The driving energy was primarily from potential renters; a remarkable percentage stuck it out for the 8 years it took to get housed. Our mission is based on commitment to community as family and sustainability (urban style). All residents, as members of the co-operative not-for profit association, manage the rental houses. We have an accountability and reporting responsibility via the Ministry of Housing, a state department. It takes some effort to keep the bureaucratic fist from squeezing too tight. This was all possible because 12 years ago, the slightly-left-of-centre Federal Govt of the time, initiated a Community Housing Programme with a co-operative housing component and a commitment to promoting tenant involvement in development, design and construction. It was good luck that the architect (also our architect and local hero) applied cohousing design principles to the first rental co-op, although they don't 'live' cohousing (the common house is a resource for the co-op tenants rather than the centre of a collective life-style). Their mission remains tenant managed, affordable rental housing with security of tenure and is successful. What am I saying? Any variation upon the theme is fine with me so let's not lock the definition into a narrow albeit dominant category. I don't love the idea of cohousing that looks like a gated community but it's only one step along the range of interpretations and clearly most coho folk have a sense of social responsibility. People will do the best they can, driven by the desire to fulfil personal priorities - that's all that I'm doing. Perhaps the increased security and communal support that even the most apparently self-serving coho group achieves may enable residents to take the next step towards social justice. Or maybe not. Warmest regards Robyn Williams Pinakarri Community Fremantle, Western Australia "Through Pinakarri - deep listening - we learn to love more completely."
-
Why cohousing should not be mission driven to be affordable housing Rob Sandelin, November 2 2000
- RE: Why cohousing should not be mission driven to be affordable housing Rob Sandelin, November 2 2000
- Re: Why cohousing should not be mission driven to be affordable housing Robyn Williams, November 3 2000
- Re: Why cohousing should not be mission driven to be affordable housing Ann Zabaldo, November 3 2000
- Re: Why cohousing should not be mission driven to be affordable housing Eris Weaver, November 3 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.