Re: salaried members for development process | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonvillines![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:35:02 -0700 (MST) |
> Do any of you have experience with putting a member on salary for the > development phase? How did that work (or not)? The front side of hiring within the group is that you expect someone from within the group to be as committed to the outcome as the rest of the group is. Often they are more committed and willing to give up other activities to devote more time to the project. But as in all hiring from "within the family" you can get either highly trained competent committed people or Uncle Harry's favorite arrogant and incapable child who needs a job and will work for less. We had two members "on staff" but not hired directly by the group. One worked with the developer to promote cohousing and the other was hired with grant monies to work with the architectural firm (also owned by the developer) to study and choose appropriate green materials. They were both invaluable to the project. They worked actively on teams as well as "going to the office every day." They each had clear qualifications for the jobs that would have gotten them hired even if they had not been members of our group. Other projects have not been so fortunate, or even so willing to have some members paid to work while others weren't. A defining characteristic of cohousing is the tension between being a "community" and being a $ multi-million real estate project. How many people who want to live in a house actually know how to finance, design, and construct one. Even fewer know all the legal ins and outs of government regulations. Or how to juggle all the sub-contractors and contractual specifications involved. And how many of us even know how to build the community we think we want? It's one thing to become a member of a community and another to either invest your life savings or mortgage your financial future to one. Cohousing requires both. Uncle Harry's spoiled and lazy child can be taken on as a church secretary and nurtured into a responsible adult but it takes a lot of time and others can cover for him when he fails. If you hire him as your construction manager, and construction is starting, you are in trouble. It is very hard to develop or strengthen a new community when one of its members just delayed the whole project for 6 months by not meeting a city deadline for permit applications or allowed the basement foundations to be poured in such a way that they all have to be torn up again delaying it even more. Or at an orientation has not impressed 20 prospective members with his knowledge of north and south let alone east and west. The kinds of expertise required in real estate development _change_ from one point to the next. If you hire a member, how do you un-hire them when the needs of the group change? Are you trusting them because you know them or because they know the job that needs to be done? A member may still be your best bet, and we couldn't have done without ours being on staff, but being in DC we also have a particularly adept and professionally trained group of members who know how to handle group process, contracts, and agreements. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org Where all units are sold, only one still to close, and we are still trying to find out why the gas fireplace on one unit comes on when the one next door does, why the phones go out every fourth day, and whether there really was soundproofing installed between all the units. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
salaried members for development process Sheila Braun, March 7 2001
- Re: salaried members for development process Sharon Villines, March 7 2001
- Cohousing in San Diego? Robert Schrader, March 7 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.