RE: RE: [C-L]_Re:common house as public building | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 02:14:05 -0600 (MDT) |
If you are legally organized as a condo,and 80% of cohousing is, then you should question why you are are not treated the same as all the condos in your area, assuming that is to your benefit. If all condos in your area have their multipurpose room designated as a public building then you are doomed to that fate. However, be sure to assert that you are just building a CONDO. This actually makes bldg departments job much easier, and its the absolute truth. In the legal world, and to the bank, you are just another condo, and should be treated just the same as all the rest of them. At Sharingwood we got into some issues with the building department who wanted us to do some unreasonable things. We asked, politely, can you help us find examples of other condos that have had to do these things? They hemmed and hawed, then we jumped on them and said, look, we are just another condo so don't discriminate against us. They backed off the unreasonable requirements. On your plans your commonhouse should be labeled just like every other condo with whatever the local terminology is (multipurpose building is used in my area.) If you make it different than normal, it makes the bldg departments job harder, and then they find reasons to make things harder for you than they have to be. If its different, then they have to define it, make a category for it, etc. Condos exist almost everywhere, they are well understood. On paper, cohousing is just a condo with a big multi-purpose building. This is OK. What's on these papers does not mean you can't be a community, do meals, care about each other and work together in the ways you want to. There are no condo police that hold you to the CCand R's against your will. I think it is sometimes a mistake to explain cohousing to them unless it is to your advantage to do so. They don't care, don't need to know, and if calling yourselves something other than a condo hurts you then doing so is against your interests. You are a group of people who joined together to invest and build a condo. Of course the cohousing developers and architects and other advocates would say this is not the right approach, we should be educating these people, and creating our own rules and building codes just for cohousing. Well, as a group that's your call. Keep it simple as much as you can. Real Estate development is a HUGE burden on your community, and it is probably not why your are doing this. You choose where to spend your time. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood Condominium _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: RE: [C-L]_Re:common house as public building Berrins, April 18 2001
- RE: RE: [C-L]_Re:common house as public building Rob Sandelin, April 19 2001
- RE: RE: [C-L]_Re:common house as public building Lashbrook, Stephan, April 18 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.