Re: Questions about cohousing experiences with rentals | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonvillines![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:30:01 -0600 (MDT) |
> The thing that is missing from our rental agreement is community overview of > participation expectations. If I could be in charge of this, I would have a > quarterly review of renters, and those that prove themselves to be not > "vitally interested" in the community, would be given a notice and if their > participation did not increase, would be given notice to leave. On other occasions, you have been very cool to any attempts to measure work. Why is this different for renters? And do you think the size of the community makes a difference in renters being visible (or invisible). We have invisible renters but since I am so unaware of them, it doesn't bother me. It does bother others. it would bother me if they ate meals and hung out in the commonhouse. They don't. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Questions about cohousing experiences with rentals S. Kashdan, April 27 2001
-
RE: Questions about cohousing experiences with rentals Rob Sandelin, April 27 2001
- Re: Questions about cohousing experiences with rentals Sharon Villines, April 27 2001
- Re: rentals Kay Argyle, May 9 2001
-
RE: Questions about cohousing experiences with rentals Rob Sandelin, April 27 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.