RE: Re: financing doesn't define cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 23:09:08 -0600 (MDT) |
Lynn said that she didn't think bank financing was an important definition of cohousing. Right, in the definition I was creating I was comparing communes and Cohousing. And in that regard, bank financing is a key difference. There are 0 communes that have bank mortgages that I have been able to find. In my experience, a great majority of non-cohousing community forms do not have bank mortgages either. So, for cohousing's self made definition, this is probably not very important, but, in comparison to other community types, it is a key distinction. As is the private ownership of homes. Many other community forms do not provide private ownership of homes, and most don't have bank financing. Rob -----Original Message----- From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Lynn Nadeau Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 8:44 PM To: cohousing L Subject: [C-L]_Re: financing doesn't define cohousing Rob responded to RoseWind: >All the homes are privately financed? You are the first and only cohousing group that I have heard that uses that model. Lynn clarifies: I was differentiating between what belongs to RoseWind Cohousing -- the land and the common house, which were done with cash. RoseWind owned the whole site originally, both the commons and the building lots. But we sold the lots, one after another, to joining members, and now all 23 lots are owned by members. As the money came in from lot sales, we first paid off the land (so we could do the Planned Unit Development process with the City), then paid for the infrastructure (which was required before we could build anything), and then paid for the common house. It all came out even in the end. (Can this really be a unique approach? It's a straight forward way to spend the money as you get it, without going into debt. I thought all "lot development" models worked like that, but I forgot that at least some, like Rob's, are condos not nonprofit mutual benefit corporations, which I guess changes things. But surely others have taken this approach? Talking Circle, on Whidbey Island, is also a nonprofit with a HOA.) Individual homes are built, and paid for, according to the individual owners, some of whom have mortgages, of course. But that does not involve RoseWind. I've never heard that anyone had trouble getting a construction loan because we are cohousing. We each have "normal" ownership of our lot (about 5000 sq ft, like other city lots) and can resell it like other real estate. The property is bound to RoseWind through the CC&Rs, Bylaws, PUDA with the City, and other documents of the Homeowners' Association, which run with the deed. Ownership=membership. AND the point I wanted to make in my post was simply that I didn't see any function in DEFINING cohousing by how it is financed. All the usual definitions, such as appeared in the Cohousing Journal 10th anniversary issue, are far more relevant, to my mind. If it's member designed and managed, has extensive common facilities, intentional neighborliness and mutual support and interaction, and that sort of thing, that seems to be useful definition. However it is or isn't financed. Which may be interesting to observe and describe, nonetheless. Lynn Nadeau Most cohouisng start ups are self financed, but later the >homes are then financed by mortgages. I imagine if you don't use bank >mortgages either owners hold the contracts or the buyers pay cash? How do >resales happen? I would think not having bank mortgages would really limit >your ability to resell a home. > I would only differ in the "bank financed" part. >It certainly is not part the DEFINITION of cohousing, though it often >describes it. Lynn Nadeau, RoseWind Cohousing Port Townsend Washington (Victorian seaport, music, art, nature) http://www.olypen.com/sstowell/rosewind http://www.ptguide.com _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Financing doesn't define cohousing Lynn Nadeau, May 12 2001
-
RE: Financing doesn't define cohousing Rob Sandelin, May 13 2001
- RE: Financing doesn't define cohousing Eileen McCourt, May 13 2001
-
Re: financing doesn't define cohousing Lynn Nadeau, May 13 2001
- RE: Re: financing doesn't define cohousing Rob Sandelin, May 13 2001
- RE: Re: financing doesn't define cohousing Catya Belfer-Shevett, May 14 2001
-
RE: Financing doesn't define cohousing Rob Sandelin, May 13 2001
-
RE: Re: financing doesn't define cohousing Racheli&John, May 14 2001
- Selecting members Rob Sandelin, May 14 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.