Use of email, Face to Face, Control Issues | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonvillines![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:36:01 -0600 (MDT) |
>> One of the things I think is scary but important is the element of >> illumination of issues. Email makes it easy to expose the hidden >> grumblings and bring them up for community work. Not every >> community wants to do this and you would be wise to talk about >> if and how you want to air things. > > Face-to-face discussions were so obviously > superior -- more warm, more polite, more direct, more inclusive, more ... > something [snip] One thing for sure, meeting discussions > are more controllable. Praise the lord and pass the potatoes! We are currently going through another TOO MUCH EMAIL discussion. I don't think people _consciously_ complain about email because they can't control it, but I do think it frightens them and feels uncontrollable. They say that it is email that causes the confusion and upset, as if it were inherently a confusing medium. In person, you can read inflections and facial expressions so face to face is inherently clearer -- and thus better. Yes -- It may be sometimes be clearer but it is also more manipulative. The heavier the inflection, the harder it is to speak in disagreement. I like thinking about issues and responding when I feel moved to do so -- not on someone else's schedule "This agenda item has 10 minutes." "You didn't put that on the agenda so we can't discuss it no matter how important you think it is." I dislike having to speak after one person's stump-speech which colors one's own comments even when one's comments have nothing to do with the comments that were made just before you. You just ended up on the queue together. I find this very confusing! No dialogue -- only random seriatim statements. And I absolutely love being able to address everyone directly. Only email or paper copies allow this. There will never be a meeting at which everyone is present and long enough to hear everyone speak. And it requires people to respond to everyone -- not make private statements that express their own view while ignoring the expressed interests of others. And the same people who complain about email also complain about meetings. I now read the TOO MUCH EMAIL discussions as overload. People can't deal with whatever is being posted anymore than they can deal with lots of meetings. Its TOO MUCH. Control and overload are the two main issues I think. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: meetings, (continued)
- Re: meetings Matt Lawrence, June 8 2001
- Re: meetings Sharon Villines, June 8 2001
- Use of email Rob Sandelin, June 9 2001
- Re: Use of email Kay Argyle, June 11 2001
- Use of email, Face to Face, Control Issues Sharon Villines, June 12 2001
- Re: Use of email, Face to Face, Control Issues Ken Collerman, July 4 2001
- Re: meetings Gary.Stewart, June 8 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.