Re: "Associate" Members of cohousing grpups | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 00:26:01 -0600 (MDT) |
I must apologize in advance for not really answering your question, but there's something I would like to suggest instead. If mobility problems are keeping a member from buying a house, why are you not building a unit that s/he *can* buy - one that's accessible? It's a good investment for the future, even if that person leaves and someone else buys it. -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California tamgoddess [at] home.com http://members.home.net/southsideparkcohousing ---------- > We are trying to establish a policy on "Associate Members". We have a family > who cannot use one of our units (mobility/health reasons), but want to be a > part of our community. They are considering buying a lot adjacent to our > property and building their own home. > > Do any other groups have a policy for this, establishing fees for their using > the common house, etc. > > > ------------------------------------ > Dick Kohlhaas <rlkohl [at] earthlink.net> > Colorado Springs (Colorado) Cohousing Community (Casa Verde Commons) > (Currently 29 intending owner families; we own a 4.7 acre property 1.5 miles > from downtown where we plan to build 34 units; starting construction > Summer 2001. Visit us at http://www.colospringscohousing.com) _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
"Associate" Members of cohousing grpups Richard L. Kohlhaas, July 7 2001
- Re: "Associate" Members of cohousing grpups Elizabeth Stevenson, July 7 2001
- Re: "Associate" Members of cohousing grpups/Accessibility Ann Zabaldo, July 8 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.